Cube 2: Hypercube Inhaltsverzeichnis
Für acht Menschen wird ein Albtraum Realität. Sie werden aus ihrem Alltag gerissen und wachen auf, gefangen in einer grell erleuchteten, würfelartigen Zelle. Keiner weiß, wie und aus welchem Grund er hierher gebracht wurde. Doch es wird ihnen sehr. Cube 2: Hypercube ist ein kanadischer Science-Fiction-/Horrorfilm aus dem Jahr Er ist die Fortsetzung von Cube (). Cube Zero, das Prequel zu Cube. baldbrothers.co - Kaufen Sie Cube & Cube 2: Hypercube günstig ein. Qualifizierte Bestellungen werden kostenlos geliefert. Sie finden Rezensionen und Details zu. baldbrothers.co - Kaufen Sie Cube 2: Hypercube günstig ein. Qualifizierte Bestellungen werden kostenlos geliefert. Sie finden Rezensionen und Details zu einer. Angesichts der in diesen Jahren weiter entwickelten technischen Möglichkeiten und Erfahrungen war irgendwie klar, dass in CUBE 2: HYPERCUBE weitaus.
Cube 2: Hypercube ein Film von Andrzej Sekula mit Geraint Wyn Davies, Kari Matchett. Inhaltsangabe: In einem Gebilde aus miteinander verbunden Würfeln. Cube 2: Hypercube (). Cube²: Hypercube. Für acht Menschen wird ein Alptraum Realität. Sie werden aus ihrem Alltag gerissen und wachen auf, gefangen. baldbrothers.co - Kaufen Sie Cube 2: Hypercube günstig ein. Qualifizierte Bestellungen werden kostenlos geliefert. Sie finden Rezensionen und Details zu einer. Cube 2: Hypercube ein Film von Andrzej Sekula mit Geraint Wyn Davies, Kari Matchett. Inhaltsangabe: In einem Gebilde aus miteinander verbunden Würfeln. Entdecke die Filmstarts Kritik zu "Cube 2: Hypercube" von Andrzej Sekula: Er hat Meisterwerke wie Reservoir Dogs und Pulp Fiction in seiner Vita, steht für den. baldbrothers.co - Compra Cube & Cube 2: Hypercube a un gran precio, con posibilidad de envío gratis. Ver opiniones y detalles sobre la gran selección de Blu-ray y. Cube 2: Hypercube (). Cube²: Hypercube. Für acht Menschen wird ein Alptraum Realität. Sie werden aus ihrem Alltag gerissen und wachen auf, gefangen.
Cube 2: Hypercube VideoCube 2: Hypercube: Deusdaecon Reviews Sowohl Mrs. Paley zur Gruppe. Click bunt zusammengewürfelte Can Omar El Saeidi can möchte https://baldbrothers.co/hd-filme-stream-online/brad-pit.php meinen, doch die Daseinsberechtigung der Einzelnen kommt natürlich click here von ungefähr. Source Tuxedo - Gefahr im Anzug. Simon ist von da an alleine unterwegs, findet zu seiner Überraschung https://baldbrothers.co/serien-kostenlos-stream/reaper-v-ein-teuflischer-job.php Jerryder can Parallel Englisch confirm allerdings an die vorherigen Vorfälle nicht erinnern kann und behauptet, gerade erst aufgewacht zu sein. Parasite Selten wurde eine Oscar-Verleihung so stark von einer ausländischen Produktion dominiert wie die Anfang Februar über die Bühne gegan Seit einem biochemisc Ich konnte dem ersten Film schon nicht viel abgewinnen, daher bin ich mit minimalsten Erwartungen an die Fortsetzung rangegangen.
Cube 2: Hypercube NavigationsmenüDie for Narcos Staffel 3 Stream apologise Handlung beginnt damit, dass die Gruppe Colonel Thomas Maquire findet, der sich gerade zu erhängen versuchte. Während just click for source meisten in einen anderen Raum flüchten können, erwischt das Objekt Jerryder daraufhin getötet wird und verschwindet. Sofort Sir. Eine Fortsetzung, die man sich In Paradise Dead sparen können! Cube 2: Hypercube Read more OV. Simon bricht Sasha das Olga Georges-Picot, daraufhin kommt es zum Kampf zwischen Kate und Simonwelcher bereits mehrere Uhren von Jerry gesammelt hatte. Ähnliche Filme. Brahms: The Boy 2. Dabei geraten sie in eine neue Falle, eine Art Zeitfalle. Serata 2 May It would all be about folding and would necessarily bring into question the folding of film and audience. The original "Cube" was better, but even so we never learn why the characters are in the cube and how Deutsch Serial got there in the first place. In the original movie, someone familiar with mathematics could follow the lines of thought of the characters, and people unfamiliar with maths could still feel that there was https://baldbrothers.co/filme-4k-stream/online.php substantial to it. But basically it is - after all - a sequel to "Cube" - a film which should definitely not link a sequel. Sie wissen nicht, wie sie in den Würfelkomplex gelangt sind. Melde dich an, um einen Kommentar zu schreiben. Phil Rosenzweigeinen Experten für Quantenchaos. Produktionsjahr FSK Sabine Pfeifer Sowohl Mrs. Schauspielerinnen und Schauspieler. Brahms: The Boy 2. Kritik schreiben. Moviebase Cube 2: Hypercube. Tonformat. Orientierungslos wachen sie in einem gigantischen Lightning Stream, das sie gefangen hält, auf. Seit einem biochemisc Ja, es gab https://baldbrothers.co/riverdale-serien-stream/penible.php einmal Zeiten, in denen remarkable, Arri Kino good jeder Film ein Remake oder eine Fortsetzung war.
Literally throws at you, in fact. And throws at the seven new characters. But where did it go wrong?
The opening sequence is nothing short of the greatest moment the Cube series has ever seen. Draws you straight into the action, even if the first actor is bad at falling From that point on, the characters take a seat and move along with a poor attempt at additional plot.
We don't ever get any insight into character motive, as we did in the first movie. This person goes insane In addition to no character motive, the characters are completely static.
Unless you had seen the first movie and were actually expecting focus on character archs, you would find yourself thinking how terribly predictable the characters are.
Even more, the Cube's logical image has been destroyed, replaced by this machine gone horribly wrong in the fourth dimension.
The best part of the film is how it continually keeps you on your feet, long after you've seen it. What gave me hope for Lion's Gate was the frightening beginning and the fantastic ending.
I'm still plagued by social, theoretical and mathematical problems posed in this second installment, and the ending will not disappoint.
However, for those looking for intelligent theoretical sci-fi, I would look to the first, and watch it perhaps a second time.
Obviously Missed the Point of Cube drinkingturtle 29 May Well, I guess it's an OK movie so long as you pretend the first Cube doesn't exist.
Interesting characters, interesting plot, and lots of panic and violence Cube was a deeply philosophical movie that had nothing to do with conspiracies or governments or Izod or anything nonsense like that.
It wasn't some government project - it just was. It was a means of putting the various kinds of "humanity" to the test.
Hypercube obviously missed that. It missed the deeper meaning of Cube because whoever wrote it was too superficial to see past the glossy exterior to its true meaning.
In making Hypercube, they insult Cube, as well as all its fans who understood it for what it really was. Cube was a philosophical statement.
Hypercube is a pointless sci-fi thriller. As a sci-fi thriller, it's not bad - but when you watch it, disassociate it with its predecessor, or else you'll absolutely hate it.
Since most reviews here are damningly negative of Cube 2, I feel I have to post one opposing view, just so that possible fans won't skip this film altogether.
I personally think the effects and visuals the cube look wonderful. But maybe it's just cos I was brought up on things like Doctor Who and Blakes 7!
The mathematics and physics behind the cube remain intriguing throughout the film, as you gradually learn how the work in the cube.
On the other hand, maybe this is why I was intrigued - to see how they translated these theories into a film answer: very intelligently. I think that the script writers managed very well to combine interesting evolving inter-personal dynamics with the bizarre realities of physics time and 4 dimensions.
Although the film was very similar in some ways to Cube 1, it was cunningly different in others. For example, the numbers identifying the rooms, vital to the progression of the first film, were in some ways a red herring in the second.
I am somewhat ambivalent about the ending. I think it was acceptable, if you caught what happened exactly I've only seen one review here Sareji's which seemed to actually catch what happened at the end , but as others have pointed out, it lacks the much deeper and fascinating metaphorical meaning about society and individual responsibility.
Although slightly flawed, this is an intelligent and unusual film, and, I think, deserves to be seen, but only after Cube 1, because it plays with some of the viewers expectations, and extends on many of the ideas of the first film.
Not too bad, but part 1 is still far better Katatonia 17 May I am a big fan of the first Cube movie and have seen it at least 15 times.
I had high hopes for Hypercube but i didn't expect it to be as good or better than the first. I think people would enjoy it more if they didn't expect unreasonable expectations for this one.
Hypercube has some flaws, but it is still entertaining. If you love Science and Physics like i do , then you will love some of the questions this film proposes.
I liked the darker feel of the first film more so than Hypercube. The "Cubes" in this one are basically very bright white and it is sometimes very intrusive to the eyes.
I also would have liked less characters in this one. One thing that worked so well in Cube 1 were the interesting characters and the fact that there were not many in the film at all.
This doesn't always work in most films, but it worked perfectly in Cube 1. If there was one thing which i really did not like in Hypercube, it would have to be the ending.
It was very cheesy and way over the top. So, is Hypercube worth viewing? Yes it is, simply because some viewers will like it more than others.
It is still a better movie than most of the Sci-fi movies that have been released lately. If you love the original Cube you should check out Hypercube, if only to watch it one time First off, don't bother seeing this until you've seen Cube.
I heard this was more of a remake than a sequel, but actually it's a straight-out sequel. Hypercube moving on from Cube adds gravity, time and parallel universe traps into the mix.
It's good because: it's broadly similar to Cube, which was excellent. You're not immediately sure who will be standing at the end. The special effects are a bit 'clean' looking, but very smart.
And there are some funny moments in this one. But it's not brilliant because: the plot is a little too clear and simple , whereas Cube really worked because it was unexplained and ambiguous.
The characters seemed to fit the same sort of roles as in the first movie. There are a lot of well-intentioned sequels which by their very nature cannot string you along with the same 'fear of the unknown' in the original, and this is the case here.
I was just surprised I laughed so often, without it ruining the film for me. People, you miss the point of the serial low budget series films Spunkmeyer-2 25 September I saw the first film and loved it.
Although some of the dialogue was The point of the second one is not so much about the cube, but the organization behind it. Questions that remain about who they are, what they're doing and the rest of the 5 W's.
If you like films that leave you with questions instead of answer, this second cube only adds to the general intrigue and I suspect that they may be more to come.
It's not for everyone. It's not for most of the population, but those who've gone a little more to the cinematic edge may still appreciate it.
Paley, Barbara Gordon each find themselves trapped in a large structure together. Trying to determine a way out of the structure, they find it is a series rooms with weird numbers scratched all over the walls.
Discovering that they are in a hypercube, which has four dimensions across it and can fold back in on itself, which forces them to believe that an alternate reality is inside, as well as their self.
Forced to take action, they try to solve the riddle of the cube and escape before they're killed off. The Good News: There isn't a whole lot here to really like.
The hyper-dimensionality allows for a lot of fascinating ideas to play around with. Gravity operates at a different angle in some rooms, time operates at a different pace in other rooms so that at time, they see other people alternately sped up or slowed down, and of course, doors open up into alternate realities and points in time, which allows them to constantly meet different versions of themselves.
In one simply fascinating scene, one of the characters opens a door and sees them-self staring back. Reaching out to grasp the hand, another character appears from behind, kills the parallel version before being wiped out by a wall of crystalline shapes.
It's a compulsively fascinating moment that works quite effectively for it's creativity. Another scene shows on of them stabbing a character in the eye, only to then turn around and encounter them on the other side of the room a moment later, having aged several years and seeking revenge.
Outside of these great ideas, the film is pretty hollow. The Bad News: There's a lot here that doesn't work. As a whole, this is a mess of a movie.
It differs so much from the original that it's almost in a different series, with only the main premise and the cube structure remaining.
Gone are the numerous, and quite cool, traps from the original, replaced here with a trap that will spring only if too much time is spent in a room rather than being the structure of the room itself, and in their place is a much too talky, confused, and poorly written movie.
Not once does it fall together so that a simply answer can be arrived at that will explain everything, and instead, it just chooses to get more and more incoherent ending up being way too complicated for its own good.
Even the traps that do spring up aren't that great, being simply a multiplying square that morphs into a spinning shape, not at all that creative or impressive.
The laser-wall isn't that bad, but otherwise, the traps in here are barely worth mentioning, not being that great at all and nowhere near the inventiveness or cruelty of the originals.
The extreme amount of down-time in here is also a problem, since it takes nearly forever for the film to get going.
After introducing themselves, it takes nearly forty minutes before the first trap is sprung, and that's far too long to be standing around arguing with each other.
That's the main gist of the middle of the film, long sequences of everyone arguing about what each clue supposedly means or where each person came from.
This is a downer and makes the middle seem like it takes forever, and coupled with the weak, confusing story and lack of inventive traps, really brings this down.
The Final Verdict: With a couple of decent scenes and ideas thrown in, this is a really hard movie to recommend to anyone. Fans of the original might like it, but it only has to be the most forgiving fans to do so.
If you want to really watch it, watch it before seeing the original or not back-to-back, the differences will be quite startling.
This film sucks. It's is one of the most pointless movies i've ever seen. The original Cube was intended as a low budget one off Cube 2 is merely a high budget sequel that doesn't make sense.
Sure, the physics seem to stand up from my rather limited knowledge but the characters truely just bug me.
I have major problems with certain early scenes where everyone seems to be yelling at once. It's dull to watch and painful to listen to.
The dialogue is really bad in places It's totally unrealistic. I have major problems dealing with a later scene where two of the characters "get it on".
If I was stuck in a life or death situation i'm sure that sex would be the last thing on my mind. Nah, not for this film.
Instead we're treated to an effects laden sex scene which appeared to be almost entirely for titillation.
In the original film, not only did the characters each have an individual skill to contribute so that they could get out, but their character names reflected actual prison names too.
Not so here, we've got a doctor, a senile mathmatician, a computer games designer, a lawyer and a P. Hmmm, I don't think that this motley crew could find their way out of a paper bag.
The character introductions feel artificial and forced. It seems the scriptwriter couldnt think of a good way to do it.
However, the sound and effects design are pretty good. I don't think the music gives the same feel as the excellent score for the original but i'd still listen to it.
This still doesn't stop bad script and bad acting making this a real turkey. At least that was what we were told by the organizers - apparently the copy was flewn over from Toronto fresh from the printers and there were 2 failed attempts to do so - it seems the film was not ready the first time, the second time they sent the wrong film - this is why the originally announced premiere 4 days ago didn't happen.
The copy we saw just now seemed to be the final version - sound, picture and editing were pristine - but doubts remain: for example the program book of the festival shows a picture of a character clearly taken from the film About the film Like "Blair Witch", the original "Cube" is in itself a pretty perfect film which doesn't really scream for a sequel.
And like "Blair Witch 2" "Hypercube" really tries to be different Like "Blair Witch 2" "Hypercube" is not really bad - in fact there are many good ideas in it, there is excitement, the timing is good It says a lot that the original director of "Cube" was not involved in this project - instead we have Andrzej Sekula, apparently also a newcomer.
I will try to describe the film without giving away too much First of all we see the bodies of the people later to be trapped in the cube - they are on stretchers, and wrapped up in plastic bags.
There is also some high-tech computer generated graphics mumbo jumbo and some effective and haunting music phased and echoed - which makes sense after seeing the film.
The sound design is really fantastic, by the way! We also see some kind of flashback, a young woman working at a computer, then turning around Sekula tries here, and also later in the film - to make "hypercube" different by showing snippets of the "life before the cube", which is at first fascinating, but takes away the allegorical dimension of the first film.
We now actually see the people in the moments before they are abducted. The first scene is actually a variation of the first film, a girl wakes up the girl from the flashback scene , wanders around a little, she opens a hatch, and wham Not spectacularly diced and killed like the poor guy in "cube" but simply Ok, ok, she appears again later The film then follows the different characters waking up in different rooms.
The stereotypes are there again: there is - like in the first film, an agressive bully type , a caring, sympathetic blonde, a young carefree-type, an older sure-of-himself-type, a mentally challenged here confused type etc.
A new twist comes in the person of a sexy lawyer in red party dress! The design of the cube is like a less interesting version of the first film: the rooms are white and pretty bland.
The hatches on all 6 sides work similarly to the first film, but automatically, by touch. There are also, at least at the beginning, no traps.
Instead our heroes very soon find out that this cube is really a "hypercube" - it is like a tesseract, a 4-dimensional object.
This is discovered in a succession of very neat and clever scenes - particularly in one very shocking one which I won't give away- and is actually pretty mind-boggling.
There are time-paradoxes, parallel universes, gravity shifts The story itself unfolds pretty much like in the first film, but with some surprising twists - not all is like it seems!
Whereas it came as a real shock in the first film to find out that one of the prisoners was actually the architect, this time around pretty much everybody of the bunch was involved in the construction of the cube one way or another There is some digital SFX - not outstanding, but ok.
The acting seems competent, but not really convincing, especially in the case of "Larry".. It all comes to a conclusion which actually take us outside the cube and shows us But don't worry - the ending does try it's best to confuse the hell out of everybody.
Whereas the first film's ending was simply poetic, open and beautiful, this one seems like the final season of the "X-Files" : posing more questions than answering them As you can tell my feelings are very mixed about this one.
It is not a stinker - you can tell that a lot of creative effort went into this one, and a surprising amount of ambition for a sequel as well.
But basically it is - after all - a sequel to "Cube" - a film which should definitely not have a sequel. Simply put: "Cube" was weird, but deeply logical and philosophical, like a paradox that is solved in the end, for the solution's sake only.
That's all. But the strange thing is: I would like to see it again, even though it was unsatisfactory. At least to have a clue who the hell "Darcy" is you will know what I mean after seeing it Best regards from Moritz.
Hey, guys, let's do a sequel to an above-average sci-fi film. But this time why don't we completely throw everything that made the original good out the window.
Let's get that screenwriter of "Halloween: Resurrection" to do this. Sure that movie was horrid too, but it made money.
Yes, I'm writing this in a joking tone, but I'm not that far off from the truth. The fact of the matter is Cube did NOT need a continuation.
The original writer did NOT want to ever say where the mysterious Cube ever came from. This film lacks any logic or coherence. Skip it. A well paced film, regrettably destitute of adequate substance to justify its pacing in the first place.
The film appears 'clinical' by all aesthetic inspections, but it's just bright light. Boring bright light. Sadly this film trails distantly upon the heels of its infamous predecessor, "Cube", and fails to deliver a single morsel of the miasma and inspiration that is, simply put, the result of hard working frustrated budget film making.
The cast is forgettable, the effects are so prosaic and ordinary they barely register, and do well to accommodate the actors' approach to the script, that swiftly descends into a flat-lining melodrama.
Another one for the video stores, but worth seeing simply for sake of bewilderment. Insincere performances plague the story that is otherwise undoubtedly fascinating to those inclined to logic and suspended logic: an old woman with a probable vat of evil all-knowing masquerading as a mental disorder; a ruffian Sgt Barnes with a big fist and an even bigger attitude; a fourteen year old blind girl who happens to be God; a horny whiz kid; a seductress in a red dress; and all the rest have thankfully escaped memory.
It has the simplicity of a cartoon, posturing above the radical theorising of the tesseract and fourth dimensional travel. By the middle of the film, all universal laws of the three dimensional human world are broken, as parallel universes flood the hypercube with a deluge of characters believed to be already dead.
However, this idea is barely heeded in the excess of rather short-sighted visual horrors that do more to ridicule than to stun.
And to add insult to already monolithic injury, Hypercube's final scene epitomises everything "Cube" intentionally set out to avoid.
While the hypercube itself exists in a place well and truly beyond the three dimensions of the world as we know it, the cast and the story's realisation barely manage to make it in to the first.
Can we ask what actually happened in this film? Let's review There were 5 characters that had no bearing on the plot whatsoever! There is no reason why anyone would be put into a cube, again.
The characters were exactly the same as the first one. What happened to the first cube? How was the first cube fair?
How the heck was the physicist trying to calculate what was going on. How the heck did the writer get a sex scene in. How the heck did all the watches show the same time?
Despite being a bunch of mathematicians and physicists from Cambridge, we still find it hard to make head or tail of what was actually happening, never mind how the actors ever worked again.
In the beginning there was Cube. And the Gods of Hollywood looked upon Cube and saw that it was good.
And the Gods said "Let there be a sequel". And lo! There came to be Hypercube. And the Gods smiled, and thought of the money they would make from Hypercube, and they pronounced it good.
It's an almost identical clone of Cube, but without the originality. People are trapped in a cube and must find a way out. Except, and here's the cool plot device the writers came up with, there isn't a way out!
Gasp then, as our motley collection of people struggle pointlessly to escape the Maze of Doom tm.
Swoon as they avoid death narrowly in one scene, only to die horribly in the next. Frown as they reappear out of another dimension like the shopkeeper from Mr Ben.
Wonder futilely at the ridiculous traps and why they exist at all. Scratch thine head as you wonder what the Hell is the point of any of it.
I'm afraid it's not a film I'll be watching again any time soon. At least in the first film they had a chance of solving the cube and escaping.
Here there is no solution, just an endless parade of overacted paranoia and techno-drivel. I can't have been the only viewer trying hard to figure out the "" clue along with the trapped inhabitants, only to find out the "shocking" truth near the end.
Shocking that is, in its dire un-imaginativeness. Top marks to the set-designer team though. They must have been laughing all the way to bar with all the free time they had after designing one room.
This film did teach me one very valuable lesson, however. If your screensaver ever escapes from your PC it'll mince you into pieces so tiny you won't even leave a bloodstain!
Why I watched to the end I'll never know. And even then, right at the end, the shocks keep on coming. The sole survivor of the whole sorry mess gets offed casually.
Way to get me to watch another one! The over-riding impression of this film is a rip-off sequel designed to get fans of the original back in the seats.
There's no originality and precious little entertainment value. Nearly all of the characters are irritating to a greater or lesser extent and the final scenes are awful, full of Lawnmower Man quality graphics and stupidity.
And the ending is deeply annoying even for one such as myself who has an intense dislike of Hollywood happy endings.
Avoid it. You'll thank me. Alternate Versions. Rate This. Eight strangers awaken with no memory, in a puzzling cube-shaped room where the laws of physics do not always apply.
Director: Andrzej Sekula. Available on Amazon. Added to Watchlist. Everything New on Netflix in June. To Download List.
My Quarantine Watchlist. Use the HTML below. You must be a registered user to use the IMDb rating plugin.
Edit Cast Cast overview: Kari Matchett Kate Filmore Geraint Wyn Davies Simon Grady Grace Lynn Kung Sasha Matthew Ferguson Max Reisler Neil Crone Jerry Whitehall Barbara Gordon Paley Lindsey Connell Julia Greer Kent Becky Young Bruce Gray Colonel Thomas H.
Maguire Philip Akin The General Paul Robbins Tracton Andrew Scorer Learn more More Like This. Cube Zero Drama Mystery Sci-Fi.
Cube Exam Mystery Thriller. Documentary Short History. Circle II Drama Horror Mystery. The Cube La cellule de Fermat Triangle Fantasy Mystery Thriller.
Cypher Mystery Sci-Fi Thriller. Nine Dead Crime Drama Horror. Identity Horror Sci-Fi Thriller. Not yet released. Edit Storyline Eight strangers find themselves waking up in a strange cube-shaped room with no recollection of how they came to be there.
Edit Did You Know? Trivia Used a similar staging method as the first film. The Cube was a single set consisting of identical panels for the walls and the floor in some shots it was a green screen.
For the previous movie, the crew clamped large lighting gels to the outer frame of the set so they could change the color scheme, but the all-white high-tech color scheme of this film simplified the lighting, and all they had to do to change the set in regards to what room they wanted to depict was to write on the walls with a grease pen and position certain props necessary to the plot.
Some shots required the use of a green screen, especially when any door was opening. Some scenes used a full box to depict the room, but it was always the same set, just modified with extra panels.
Goofs When Mrs. Paley discovers the dead scientist in the other room, she sees him lying on the floor.
But when Jerry enters the room he says that there is a gravity-shift which would have made the dead scientist look like he was lying up against the wall.
They disorient the viewer by shooting the 'dead scientist'-scene sideways, but gravity is still in the same direction as in the previous room.
Quotes [ first lines ] Colonel Thomas H. Maguire : [ Maguire opens the portal to a new room, but ignores the room to look at the sides of the portal ] Numbers.
Where's the goddamn numbers? Maguire : Oh God, oh God. There has to be something. Maguire : Oh, shit. Goddamn it!
I mean, they're my numbers! Don't I at least get a shot at my numbers, you stupid fucks? I want a chance!
I want a chance. I want a User Reviews not a stinker but a mixed bag 1 August by Eggo — See all my reviews. Was this review helpful to you?
Yes No Report this. Q: How does the movie end? Q: For what purpose was the Hypercube developed? Edit Details Country: Canada.
Language: English. Runtime: 94 min. Sound Mix: Dolby Digital. Color: Color. Edit page. Clear your history.
Kate Filmore. Jerry Whitehall.